1. Quantum Drude oscillators: a minimal model of electronic response
How far can three numbers {ω, μ, q} go in describing atoms' response to each other?
Most of my work rests on one idea: an atom’s valence electron cloud can be represented as a quantum Drude oscillator (QDO), defined by just a frequency \(\omega\), a mass \(\mu\) and a charge \(q\). The win is that response and interaction properties then follow analytically, without an electronic-structure calculation.
Two results make the model practical. In the optimized QDO (OQDO) parametrization, all three parameters are fixed from only the static dipole polarizability and the \(C_6\) coefficient — giving accurate polarization potentials and multipolar dispersion coefficients across the periodic table. Building on that, I derived a universal pairwise vdW potential whose functional form comes from the QDO model itself and which again needs only \(\alpha_1\) and \(C_6\) per element. It has since been adopted as the long-range module in machine-learned force-field frameworks including SO3LR and FeNNol.
I also led a community review synthesizing what QDO models can and cannot do, written with colleagues across the field.
I am currently pushing the model into territory it was never built for: covalent bonding. At this stage it is a proof of concept, and its value lies in mapping where the model works and where it genuinely breaks. If successful, this points towards a single coarse-grained framework covering covalent and noncovalent bonding alike.
Key papers: JCP 2025 (review) · JCTC 2023 · JPCL 2023
Two coupled QDOs and the model parameters. Correlated displacements of the drudons give the dispersion interaction.
vdW binding curves obtained from the QDO model accurately recover the coupled-cluster reference.